The taxon provincialis is not accepted as a species by most of the recent authorities, eg., the European checklist by Wiemers etal (2018), etc. The only place I am aware of where this taxon has the species level is the Italian checklist by Balletto etal (2014). I am not aware of any justification of the species status of this taxon.
As a result, there is mess here: some observations (of clearly the same taxon) are listed under provincialis, some -- under aurinia. We need to treat this somehow.
If you object, please comment here. In such a case, it would be useful to provide a justification of the specific status: eg., molecular evidence, etc.
Los desacuerdos no deseados ocurren cuando un padre (B) es
disminuido al mover un hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico,
resultando en que los IDs existentes del padre sean interpretados
como desacuerdos con los IDs existentes del hijo movido.
Identification
ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no deseado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del cambio de taxon
Si disminuir a un padre resulta en más de 10 desacuerdos no deseados, debes dividir al padre después de cambiar al hijo para reemplazar las identificaciones existentes de
el padre (B) con identificaciones que no están en desacuerdo.
Reasons for this change:
The taxon provincialis is not accepted as a species by most of the recent authorities, eg., the European checklist by Wiemers etal (2018), etc. The only place I am aware of where this taxon has the species level is the Italian checklist by Balletto etal (2014). I am not aware of any justification of the species status of this taxon.
As a result, there is mess here: some observations (of clearly the same taxon) are listed under provincialis, some -- under aurinia. We need to treat this somehow.
If you object, please comment here. In such a case, it would be useful to provide a justification of the specific status: eg., molecular evidence, etc.
@chrisvanswaay @leo_dapporto @sindic @roberto_sindaco @leibele @heinerziegler