Just going to add a side note. I probably wouldn't have lumped these back under variety. Silphiums are likely to be split out more rather than lumped back in, in future. I do understand that it follows POWO, and honestly there's not a satisfying Silphium treatment (Mason Brock's treatment in Flora of the Southeastern US is the best I've used and even he admits it's not perfect). For now this is probably the logical step, but I expect this may be undone in a few years.
Los desacuerdos no deseados ocurren cuando un padre (B) es
disminuido al mover un hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico,
resultando en que los IDs existentes del padre sean interpretados
como desacuerdos con los IDs existentes del hijo movido.
Identification
ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no deseado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del cambio de taxon
Si disminuir a un padre resulta en más de 10 desacuerdos no deseados, debes dividir al padre después de cambiar al hijo para reemplazar las identificaciones existentes de
el padre (B) con identificaciones que no están en desacuerdo.
Just going to add a side note. I probably wouldn't have lumped these back under variety. Silphiums are likely to be split out more rather than lumped back in, in future. I do understand that it follows POWO, and honestly there's not a satisfying Silphium treatment (Mason Brock's treatment in Flora of the Southeastern US is the best I've used and even he admits it's not perfect). For now this is probably the logical step, but I expect this may be undone in a few years.