@williammcfarland@ungberg@vvoelker @wildlandblogger @ciafre I committed the swaps. Per iNat guidelines D. dichotomum should be split. Since they are not atlased this will change all D. dichotomum ID's (but not infraspecifics) to D. dichotomum complex, which I think it is appropriate, since D. lucidum and D. microcarpon are fairly wide-ranging and (at least D. microcarpon) common, and most species-level-only IDs are probably referring to very broad concepts of D. dichotomum. Anyone opposed?
Los desacuerdos no deseados ocurren cuando un padre (B) es
disminuido al mover un hijo (E) a otra parte del árbol taxonómico,
resultando en que los IDs existentes del padre sean interpretados
como desacuerdos con los IDs existentes del hijo movido.
Identification
ID 2 del taxón E será un desacuerdo no deseado con la ID 1 del taxón B después del cambio de taxon
Si disminuir a un padre resulta en más de 10 desacuerdos no deseados, debes dividir al padre después de cambiar al hijo para reemplazar las identificaciones existentes de
el padre (B) con identificaciones que no están en desacuerdo.
@williammcfarland @ungberg @vvoelker @wildlandblogger @ciafre I committed the swaps. Per iNat guidelines D. dichotomum should be split. Since they are not atlased this will change all D. dichotomum ID's (but not infraspecifics) to D. dichotomum complex, which I think it is appropriate, since D. lucidum and D. microcarpon are fairly wide-ranging and (at least D. microcarpon) common, and most species-level-only IDs are probably referring to very broad concepts of D. dichotomum. Anyone opposed?