This classification under O. sphegodes is not more consensual than the another classification under O. mammosa, because this taxon is a strongly derivative one, with a unique morphology provocated by a unique pollination strategy in the genus Ophrys (shelter mimicry and not sexual deception).
Furthermore the favourite pollinator if from the genus Eucera (Anthophoridae family) but not Andrena (Andrenidae family) like O. sphegodes s.l. and O. mammosa s.l.
Finally, the morphology suggests also a possible derivative evolution from the O. argolica's group (mainly pollinated by species from genus Anthophora, Anthophoridae), e.g. Ophrys aegaea.
So the best, or the less worst solution, would be to consider it as a full species, as already done by most of the field botanists and orchidologists.